mail.dsrw.org: The time-warped mail server
Received: (qmail 4980 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2007 03:19:25 -0000
Received: from mail.dsrw.org (65.103.82.82)
by www.longlandclan.hopto.org with SMTP; 6 Nov 2007 03:19:25 -0000
Received: by mail.dsrw.org (Postfix)
id A5E1A13230; Mon, 5 Nov 2007 21:20:05 -0600 (CST)
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 21:20:05 -0600 (CST)
From: MAILER-DAEMON@mail.dsrw.org (Mail Delivery System)
Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
To: me @longlandclan.hopto.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-replied
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status;
boundary="3756B13A92.1194319205/mail.dsrw.org"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <20071106032005.A5E1A13230@mail.dsrw.org>
This is a MIME-encapsulated message.
--3756B13A92.1194319205/mail.dsrw.org
Content-Description: Notification
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
This is the mail system at host mail.dsrw.org.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.
The mail system
< someone @gmail.com>: User unknown in virtual alias table
--3756B13A92.1194319205/mail.dsrw.org
Content-Description: Delivery report
Content-Type: message/delivery-status
Reporting-MTA: dns; mail.dsrw.org
X-Postfix-Queue-ID: 3756B13A92
X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; me @longlandclan.hopto.org
Arrival-Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 20:53:33 -0600 (CST)
Final-Recipient: rfc822; someone @gmail.com
Original-Recipient: rfc822; someone @gmail.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0
Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; User unknown in virtual alias table
--3756B13A92.1194319205/mail.dsrw.org
Content-Description: Undelivered Message
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Received: from spam.dsrw.org (spam.dsrw.org [172.20.6.6])
by mail.dsrw.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3756B13A92
for < someone @gmail.com>; Mon, 5 Nov 2007 20:53:33 -0600 (CST)
X-Scanned-By: amavisd-new at dsrw.org
Received: from mail.dsrw.org ([65.103.82.82])
by spam.dsrw.org (spam.dsrw.org [172.20.6.6]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id gPXXmSrEI3v7 for < someone @gmail.com>;
Mon, 5 Nov 2007 20:52:54 -0600 (CST)
Received: from [10.211.55.3] (elektra.vpn.dsrw.org [172.20.1.30])
by mail.dsrw.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9C9013B49
for < someone @gmail.com>; Mon, 5 Nov 2007 20:53:17 -0600 (CST)
Received: from pop-7.iastate.edu (pop-7.iastate.edu [129.186.1.67])
by pop-2.iastate.edu (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id h4JENZ87005617
for < someone @pop-2.iastate.edu>; Mon, 19 May 2003 09:23:35 -0500
Received: from devirus-1.iastate.edu (devirus-1.iastate.edu [129.186.1.101])
by pop-7.iastate.edu (8.12.0/8.12.0) with SMTP id h4JENaDN012327
for < someone @iastate.edu>; Mon, 19 May 2003 09:23:36 -0500
Received: from despam-1.iastate.edu(129.186.140.6) by devirus-1.iastate.edu via csmap
id 8818; Mon, 19 May 2003 09:23:54 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from murphy.debian.org (murphy.debian.org [146.82.138.6])
by despam-1.iastate.edu (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id h4JENWtX016165
for < someone @iastate.edu>; Mon, 19 May 2003 09:23:33 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with QMQP
id 89F821FAB4; Mon, 19 May 2003 09:20:37 -0500 (CDT)
Old-Return-Path: < me @longlandclan.hopto.org>
Received: from longlandclan.hopto.org (unknown [202.47.55.78])
by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 410B01F581
for <debian>; Mon, 19 May 2003 09:02:01 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (qmail 975 invoked from network); 19 May 2003 14:01:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO longlandclan.hopto.org) (192.168.0.1)
by 192.168.5.1 with SMTP; 19 May 2003 14:01:58 -0000
Message-ID: <3EC8E3D5.6000304@longlandclan.hopto.org>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 00:01:57 +1000
From: Stuart Longland < me @longlandclan.hopto.org>
Yaay for timely bounce messages. Let’s see now… sent 20th May 2003, received 6th November, 2007… That is over 4 years and 5 months, for a bounce message. What are they using for an internet connection, RFC1149?? This is back in the days when I ran Debian/MIPS on my Indy, prior to me trying Gentoo. And back in the days when my internal network used the 192.168.0.0/24 CIDR (I now use 10.0.0.0/24 for my boxes).

Leave a Reply